O. Hlushchenko


The article explores the opportunities and threats that arise in connection with the transition of Ukraine to sustainable development. A comparative analysis of the indicators of sustainable development of Ukraine with similar indicators of the countries in the comparative group is carried out. There have been selected countries meeting a number of common requirements, namely Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Georgia and Moldova. The study has proved the hypothesis of applying the Beyond GDP methodological approach to assessing sustainable development. There is a relationship between the index of economic freedom and the indicator of corruption perception due to the fact that the existence of administrative barriers reduces economic freedom and increases tolerance to corruption in the society. There have been analyzed the components of life quality and life safety and described the profile of Ukraine with the indicators of sustainable development. The opportunities and threats that will accompany the transition to sustainable development of Ukraine have been identified. Ukraine has significant innovative and economic potential to achieve. The main threats are increasing the intensity of conflicts, reducing corruption perception, increasing state fragility and state instability.


beyond GDP; corruption perception; economic freedom; innovations; index of sustainable development; state fragility; sustainable development


Melnik, L. G. (2016). Instrumenty i kliuchevye faktory formirovaniia sesteinovoi («zelonoi») ekonomiki. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 4(178), 30-36.

Khmelkov, A. V. (2016).Tsennost instituta kontrolia dlia ustoichivogo razvitiia obshchestva.Vestnik Harkovskogo natsionalnogo universiteta imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia: ekonomicheskaia, 91, 65–73.

Yadav,A., Chhabra,S., & Aggarwal, S. (2017). Sustainability and GDP: Converging or Diverging? –An Econometric Analysis. International Education and Research Journal, 3(5), 194―197. Available at:

Cavaletti, B., & Corsi, M. (2016). “Beyond GDP” Effects on National Subjective Well–Being of OECD Countries. Social Indicators Research, 5, 1―36. Available at:–016–1477–0

Decancq, K., & Schokkaert, E. (2016). Beyond GDP: Using Equivalent Incomes to Measure Well–Being in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 126(1), 21–55. Available at:–015–0885–x

Thiry, G. (2015). Beyond GDP: Conceptual Grounds of Quantification. The Case of the Index of Economic Well–Being (IEWB). Social Indicators Research, 121(2), 313–343. Available at:–014–0650–6

Thiry, G., Bauler, T., Sebastien, L., Paris, S., & Lacroix,V. Characterizing demand for «Beyong GDP». Available at:

Chancel, L., Thiry, G., & Demailly, D. (2014).Beyond GDP Indicators: to what End? Lessons learnt from six national experiences. Study, 4. 30 p. Available at:

Hlushchenko, O. V. (2016). Dobrobut yak imperatyv suspilnoho rozvytku Ukrainy. Ekonomichnyi chasopysХХІ, 156(1–2), 31–36.

Hlushchenko, O. (2016). Well–being funding: essence and estimation method. Rivista di StudisullaSostenibilitâ, 2, 45–55.

WDC–Ukraine Data Explorer. Available at:

GOST Style Citations

Мельник, Л. Г. Инструменты и ключевые факторы формирования сестейновой («зелёной») экономики [Текст] / Л. Г. Мельник // Актуальні проблеми економіки. – 2016. – № 4 (178). – С. 30–36.

Хмельков, А. В.  Ценность института контроля для устойчивого развития общества [Текст] / А. В. Хмельков // Вестник Харьковского национального университета имени В. Н. Каразина. Серия: Экономическая. 2016. – № 91. – С. 65–73.

Yadav, A. Sustainability and GDP: Converging or Diverging? – An Econometric Analysis [Electronic resource] / Ashutosh Yadav, Shilpi Chhabra, Swati Aggarwal // International Education and Research Journal. – 2017. – Vol. 3, Issue 5. – P. 194–197. – Available at:

Cavaletti, B. «Beyond GDP» Effects on National Subjective Well–Being of OECD Countries [Electronic resource] / Barbara Cavalletti, Matteo Corsi // Social Indicators Research. – 2016. – № 5. – P. 1–36. – Available at:–016–1477–0.

Decancq, K. Beyond GDP: Using Equivalent Incomes to Measure Well–Being in Europe [Electronic resource] / Koen Decancq, Erik Schokkaert // Social Indicators Research. – 2016. – Vol. 126, Issue 1. – P. 21–55. – Available at:–015–0885–x.

Thiry, G. Beyond GDP: Conceptual Grounds of Quantification. The Case of the Index of Economic Well–Being (IEWB) [Electronic resource] / G. Thiry // Social Indicators Research. – 2015. – Vol. 121, Issue 2. – P. 313–343. – Available at:–014–0650–6.

Thiry, G. Characterizing Demand for “Beyond GDP” [Electronic resource] / G. Thiry, T. Bauler, L. Sébastien, S. Paris, V. Lacroix. – Available at:

Chancel, L. Beyond–GDP indicators: to what end? Lessons learnt from six national experiences [Electronic resource] / Lucas Chancel, Géraldine Thiry, Damien Demailly // Study. – 2014. – № 4. – 30 p. – Available at:

Глущенко, О. В. Добробут як імператив суспільного розвитку України [Текст] // Економічний часопис–ХХІ. – 2016. – № 156 (1–2). – C. 31–36.

 Hlushchenko, O. Well–being funding: essence and estimation method [Text] / O. Hlushchenko // Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilita'. – 2016. – № 2. – P. 45–55.

WDC–Ukraine Data Explorer [Electronic resource]. – Available at:



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 O. Hlushchenko

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN (print) 2306-4994, ISSN (on-line) 2310-8770