RISK ASSESSMENT FOR BIOFUEL PROJECTS: PROBLEMS OF METHODOLOGY

Authors

  • O. Halytskyi Odessa State Agrarian University
  • S. Koliadenko Vinnytsia National Agrarian University
  • H. Leshchuk Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University
  • M. Polenkova Chernihiv Polytechnic National University
  • Yu. Herasymenko Kharkiv National Agrarian University Named after V. V. Dokuchaiev

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v4i35.221857

Keywords:

biofuels, risks, agriculture, risk assessment, risk assessment methods

Abstract

Excessive use of traditional fuels in various sectors of the economy has led to the problem of exacerbation of environmental problems, rising CO2 emissions, climate change and so on. Therefore, the share of renewable energy sources, among which biofuels play an important role, has been growing in the last few decades. If the world pays considerable attention to the development of this area of alternative energy, in Ukraine, unfortunately, so far this segment has not found the right place. Agricultural, food and other enterprises are implementing various projects for the operation of production sites for the production of various types of biofuels. This, in turn, reduces the level of dependence on external price fluctuations, untimely supply of traditional fuels to enterprises, caused by seasonality in agricultural activities. However, we must not forget about the high level of risks associated with this area of business (economic) activity. Practical observations show, for the most part, that entrepreneurs (business owners) focus on subjectively-oriented methods of risk assessment, which are based on expert opinions, reducing the importance of objectively-oriented and analytical methods. Despite the obstacles to the development of biofuel production in the world and in Ukraine in particular, scientists are conducting fundamental and applied research in the use of the world’s best achievements in the use of mathematical apparatus for the evaluation of investment projects. The use of mathematical methods and models to select an effective risk assessment for biofuel production was no exception. Currently, the risk assessment of these projects takes into account: natural and climatic risks, market prices for primary products or waste products, equipment costs, prices for biofuels compared to traditional types, and so on. The methodological basis of risk assessment is contained in DSTU IEC/ISO 31010: 2013 and IEC/ISO 31010: 2009, which is the basis for the construction and use of business project assessment in various economic activities. The most effective, in terms of risk assessment for biofuel projects, is the introduction of automated information systems in business process modeling. This, in turn, makes it possible to use effective methods, namely: Multiple Imputation, leading indicators, event tree analysis, Value at Risk and correlation-regression analysis methods.

Author Biographies

O. Halytskyi, Odessa State Agrarian University

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor

S. Koliadenko, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University

Doctor of Economics, Professor

H. Leshchuk, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor

M. Polenkova, Chernihiv Polytechnic National University

Ph.D. in Economics, Associate Professor

Yu. Herasymenko, Kharkiv National Agrarian University Named after V. V. Dokuchaiev

Ph.D. in Economics, Associate Professor

References

International Energy Agency. (2020). Website. Retrieved from http://www.iea.org/stats/index.asp.

European Commission. (n. d.). EU energy statistical pocketbook and country datasheets. EU Energy in Figures. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/energy/observatory/statistics/statistics_en.htm.

Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. (2020). Enerhospozhyvannia na osnovi vidnovliuvalnykh dzherel za 2007—2019 roky [Energy consumption based on renewable sources for 2007—2019]. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua.

Havrysh, V., Nitsenko, V., Bilan, Y., & Streimikiene, D. (2019). Assessment of optimal location for a centralized biogas upgrading facility. Energy & Environment, 3 (30), 462—480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X18793110.

Nitsenko, V., Mardani, A., Streimikis, J., Shkrabak, I., Klopov, I., Novomlynets, O., & Podolska, O. (2018). Criteria for Evaluation of Efficiency of Energy Transformation Based on Renewable Energy Sources. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14 (4), 253—263. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-4.17.

Jiang, Y., Havrysh, V., Klymchuk, O., Nitsenko, V., Balezentis, T., & Streimikiene, D. (2019). Utilization of Crop Residue for Power Generation: The Case of Ukraine. Sustainability, 11 (24), 7004. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247004.

Bazaluk, O., Havrysh, V., Nitsenko, V., Baležentis, T., Streimikiene, D., & Tarkhanova, E.A. (2020). Assessment of Green Methanol Production Potential and Related Economic and Environmental Benefits: The Case of China. Energies, 13 (12), 3113. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123113.

Kaletnik, H. M. (2015). Vyrobnytstvo ta vykorystannia biopalyv [Production and use of biofuels]. Vinnytsia: Konsol [in Ukrainian].

Blium, Ya. B., Heletukha, H. H., Hryhoriuk, I. P., & Dmytruk, K. V. (2010). Biolohichni resursy i tekhnolohii vyrobnytstva biopalyva [Biological resources and technologies of biofuel production]. Kyiv : Ahrar Media Hrup [in Ukrainian].

Agarwal, A. K., Agarwal, R. A., Gupta, T., & Ram, B. (2017). Biofuels: Technology, Challenges and Prospects. Singapore: Singapore Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3791-7.

Souza, G. M., Victoria, R. L., Joly, C. A., & Verdade, L. M. (2015). Bioenergy & Sustainability: bridging the gaps. Sоа Раulo: SCOPE.

Ovchynnykova, A. V. (2014). Otsiniuvannia marketynhovykh ryzykiv v investytsiinykh proektakh na pidpryiemstvakh alternatyvnoi enerhetyky [Estimation of marketing risks in investment projects at alternative energy enterprises]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv.

Priesa, F., Talebia, A., Sandra, R., Margaret, S., & Lemayc, A. (2016). Risks affecting the biofuels industry: A US and Canadian company perspective. Energy Policy, 97, 93—101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.006.

Shevchenko, N. Yu. (2016). Matematychna model pryiniattia investytsiinykh rishen z urakhuvanniam ryzyku [Mathematical model of investment decision making taking into account risk]. Strukturni zminy u suspilstvi ta ekonomitsi pid vplyvom komunikatsii ta informatsii: materialy Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (m. Poltava, 12—13 travnia 2016 roku) — Structural changes in society and economy under the influence of communications and information: materials of the International scientific-practical conference (Poltava, May 12—13, 2016). M. V. Makarova (Ed.). (pp. 316—319). Poltava: PUET [in Ukrainian].

Zinkevych, T. S., & Dolhopolova, I. A. (2016). Stratehichnyi potentsial alternatyvnoi enerhetyky v Ukraini [Strategic potential of alternative energy in Ukraine]. Rynok tsinnykh paperiv Ukrainy — Ukrainian Securities Market, 9—10, 69—74 [in Ukrainian].

Prezydiia NAN Ukrainy. (2013). Kontseptsiia tsilovoi kompleksnoi prohramy naukovykh doslidzhen NAN Ukrainy «Biolohichni resursy i novitni tekhnolohii bioenerhokonversii» na 2013—2017 rr. Dodatok 1 do rozporiadzhennia vid 20.03.2013 №189 [The concept of the target comprehensive research program of the NAS of Ukraine «Biological resources and the latest technologies of bioenergy conversion» for 2013—2017. Annex 1 to the order of 20.03.2013 № 189]. Retrieved from http://www1.nas.gov.ua/infrastructures/Legaltexts/nas/2013/directions/OpenDocs/130320_189.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Reva, N. (2018). Logic, Reasoning, Decision-Making. Future Human Image, 10, 76—84. https://doi.org/10.29202/fhi/10/8.

Nitsenko, V., Mardani, A., Kuksa, I., & Sudarkina, L. (2018). Additional opportunities of systematization the marketing research for resource conservation practice. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 40 (3), 361—368. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2018.34.

Movchan, U. (2018). Features of Computer Methods in Political Forecasting. Ukrainian Policymaker, 3, 29—35. https://doi.org/10.29202/up/3/4.

Thornley, P., & Gilbert, P. (2013). Biofuels: balancing risks and rewards. Interface Focus, 3, 1. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2012.0040.

Nitsenko, V. S., & Rudenko, S. V. (2017). Upravlinnia ryzykamy na pidpryiemstvakh ahroprodovolchoi sfery [Risk management in agri-food enterprises]. Aktualni problemy innovatsiinoi ekonomikyActual Problems of Innovative Economy, 3, 12—21.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-24

Issue

Section

The topical questions about the development of finance, account and audit