• S. Moroz National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine
  • V. Moroz National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine
  • L. Gren’ National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute»
  • A. Pomaza-Ponomarenko National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine



motivation of labor activity, assessment of the labor potential, cross-cultural differences, obstacles in usage of employment opportunities, qualitative characteristics of labor potential, level of labor opportunities


Modern globalization and integration processes, and as a consequence the increasing level of the national economies interdependence, contribute to the actualization of issues of not only the content of coordination of national systems of socio-economic relations, but also the content of mechanisms of state management of labour resources’ development. The difficulty of solving these issues is due, on the one hand, to the existence of contradictions, both at the level of religious and cultural doctrines interested in using the potential of integration into the world’s unity of countries, and in sphere of traditions of  functioning  of national socio-economic systems, and on the other hand it lies in the existing peculiarities (differences) in the perception of social objects of the place and role of some of the determinants in ensuring the further development of person, state and society Among such determinants  are also positioned those of them whose nature is related to human actions  to meet their needs in employment. The consideration of such needs by the national government, as well as the motives associated with them, is increasingly being considered at the level of one of the conditions for increasing the effect of the impact of the country’s integration into world political and economic institutions. Considering the great importance of integration processes for Ukraine and the resulting need to adapt the national state policy to the requirements of Euro-Atlantic political and economic institutions, the issues of cross-cultural characteristics, including in the context of the formation of human labour opportunities, are socially-politically and socio-economically significant.

The clarification of cross-cultural features through the prism of the problematics of work motivation was carried out within the author’s study «Assessment of the level of development of the individual’s labour potential». According to the research program, respondents from Ukraine, Latvia and Finland were surveyed. Partners in the research organization in the European Union were the Department of Management of the Institute of Transport and Communications (Riga, Latvia) and the Department of Industrial Management of the University of Applied Sciences Savonia (Varkaus, Finland). The focus of the attention of the questions proposed in the content of the questionnaire was focused on finding out: obstacles that prevent a person from using his or her available work potential; the power of the impact of qualitative characteristics of labour potential on its overall level; distribution of shares of responsibility between the person, the organization and the state for efficiency of person’s labour potential formation. According to the results of the analysis of respondents’ answers, the place and role of cross-cultural peculiarities of work motivation in the system of human value orientations were clarified, as well as the directions of influence of certain religious and cultural doctrines on the effectiveness of the work motivation system.

Author Biographies

S. Moroz, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

Ph. D. of Public AdministrationSenior Research Officer of Training Research and Production Center

V. Moroz, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

Doctor of Public Administration, Associate ProfessorHead of the Scientific Department of Management Problems in the Field of Civil Protection of Officer of Training Research and Production Center

L. Gren’, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute»

Ph. D. of Pedagogy, Associate ProfessorAssistant Professor at Pedagogy and Psychology of Social Systems Management Department named after Academician I. Zyazyun

A. Pomaza-Ponomarenko, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

Ph. D. of Public AdministrationHead of the Scientific Department of the State Security Problems of Officer of Training Research and Production Center


Stratehiia staloho rozvytku «Ukraina — 2020» : Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 12.01.2015 № 5/2015 [Strategy of sustainable development «Ukraine — 2020»: Decree of the President of Ukraine of 12.01.2015 № 5/2015]. (2015, January 12). Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy — Official Bulletin of Ukraine, 4, 8—9 [in Ukrainian].

Blyzniuk, T. P. (2011). Kros-kulturni osoblyvosti komunikatsii v Ukraini [Cross-cultural features of communications in Ukraine]. Ekonomika rozvytku — Economics of Development, 1, 72—74 [in Ukrainian].

Gesteland, R. R. (2003). Kross-kul’turnoe povedenie v biznese: marketingovye issledovaniya, vedenie peregovorov, menedzhment v razlichnyh kul’turah [Cross-cultural behavior in business: marketing research, negotiation, management in different cultures]. Dnepropetrovsk: Balans-Klub [in Russian].

Hlinkovska, B., Chebotarov Ye., & Chebotarov, V. (2018). Kros-kulturni pidpryiemnytski komunikatsii [Cross-cultural business communications]. Starobilsk: DZ «LNU imeni Tarasa Shevchenka» [in Ukrainian].

Korzhenko, V. V., & Pysarenko, Zh. A. (2009). Vplyv natsionalnoi kultury na formuvannia modeli upravlinnia: metodyky kros-kulturnoho menedzhmentu [The influence of national culture on the formation of the management model: methods of cross-cultural management]. Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia — Actual Problems of Public Administration, 1,

16—26 [in Ukrainian].

Rakitina, N. O. (2015). Kros-kulturni osoblyvosti upravlinnia konkurentospromozhnistiu TNK [Cross-cultural features of TNC competitiveness management]. Rynok tsinnykh paperiv Ukrainy — Securities Market of Ukraine, 8, 63—68 [in Ukrainian].

Romanukha, O. M. (2017). Rol kros-kulturnykh komunikatsii u menedzhmenti orhanizatsii [The role of cross-cultural communications in the management of organizations]. Ekonomika ta upravlinnia pidpryiemstvamy — Economics and Enterprise Management, 9, 608—613 [in Ukrainian].

Shchetinina, L. V., Rudakova, S. H., & Kravets, O. V. (2017). Sutnist kros-kulturnoi kompetentnosti: vid teorii do praktyky [The essence of cross-cultural competence: from theory to practice]. Efektyvna ekonomika Efficient Economy, 4. Retrieved from [in Ukrainian].

Moroz, V. M. (2016). Mistse ta rol kros-kulturnykh osoblyvostei v systemi motyvatsii trudovoi diialnosti osobystosti: zahalnoteoretychnyi aspekt [The place and role of cross-cultural features in the system of motivation of labor activity of the individual: general theoretical aspect]. Ekonomichnyi forum — Economic Forum, 1, 355—362 [in Ukrainian].

Moroz, V. M. (2012). Motyvatsiinyi mekhanizm stymuliuvannia trudovoi aktyvnosti: derzhavno-upravlinskyi aspekt [Motivational mechanism for stimulating labor activity: public administration aspect]. Kharkiv: S.A.M. [in Ukrainian].

Barantseva, S. M., & Mospan, V. V. (2012). Teoretychne obgruntuvannia sutnosti poniat «motyvatsiia» ta «stymuliuvannia» [Theoretical substantiation of the essence of the concepts «motivation» and «stimulation»]. Stalyi rozvytok ekonomiky — Sustainable Economic Development, 3, 265—268 [in Ukrainian].

Il’in, E. P. (2006). Motivaciya i motivy [Motivation and motives]. Saint Petersburg: Piter [in Russian].

Moroz, V. M. (2011). Osnovni pryntsypy udoskonalennia motyvatsiinoho mekhanizmu stymuliuvannia trudovoi aktyvnosti hromadian [Basic principles of improving the motivational mechanism of stimulating labor activity of citizens]. Efektyvnist derzhavnoho upravlinnia — Efficiency of Public Administration, 25, 234—241 [in Ukrainian].





The social-humanitarian context of transformational finance-economical processes